Compare and contrast the Demographic Transition of one MEDC and one LEDC Essays

Compare and contrast the Demographic Transition of one MEDC and one LEDC Essays Compare and contrast the Demographic Transition of one MEDC and one LEDC Paper Compare and contrast the Demographic Transition of one MEDC and one LEDC Paper Essay Topic: Zone One The two countries that Im going to compare and contrast their Demographic Transitions with each other are England and Wales, being the MECD, and Sri Lanka, being the LECD. Differences The main difference between the two demographic transitions is that the demographic transition for Sri Lanka is entirely a twentieth century occurrence. The data starts at 1911 1920 where the demographic transition for England and Wales starts at 1651 1680. This is a lot earlier. The CDR in England and Wales started to fall a long time before the CDR started to fall in Sri Lanka, it was about 1810 when England and Wales crude death rates started to fall and although you cant be sure exactly when Sri Lankas started to fall it was nearly 100 yrs after. There is also a difference with when the CBR started to decline. With England and Wales it started in about 1891, whereas in Sri Lanka it didnt start to drop until the 1950s. One more difference is that at the present time, England and Wales are in stage 4 of the Demographic Transition, where Sri Lanka is still in stage 3. I think that the further along in the demographic transition a country is, is a sign to show how developed that certain country is. Another difference is that the time that it has taken for both these countries to go through stage 2 and 3 of the demographic transition is different. England and Wales started stage 2 in 1770 and finished stage 3 in about 1950, just under 200 years, whereas Sri Lanka only took about 100 years. Similarities The first similarities that I spotted are that even though they are both in different stages, the stages are very similar. This is shown in stage 2 of both countries where the CBR stays high and the CDR is falling. This is also true of stage 3 in each where the CBR is falling and the CDR is levelling off. Due to the decline in death rate and the birth rate staying as it is, then both countries will find an increase in population. Although this happens at different times. Reasons for Differences and similarities The reason that England and Wales CDR fell a lot earlier than Sri Lanka is because a number of reasons, theses are: Improved sanitation and hygiene brought into all urban areas by the government. This included thing such as covered sewers, water closets and means of sanitary water supply. Public health acts in 1872 and 1875 also helped, inspectors were also brought in for hygiene. Improved food supply brought about by major innovations such as crop rotation, land draining and new farm machinery. With the improvements of communications it also became easier to transport the food to areas of shortage. Reduced impact of infectious disease also helped to lower the CDR. There were many medical advances that made a difference practically in the late 19th century after the national heath service was started in 1946. Whereas in Sri Lanka the CDR fell because of some different reasons, these are: There was control of Malaria brought in which contributed 25-40% of all mortality declines. This wasnt started until 1947 when a DDT scheme got under way. There was better health care brought in, between 1938-48 the number of hospitals doubled from 115 to 246. There was an increase in foreign aid, which also boosted the health care in the country. Growth in the economy took place between1947-52 due to a rise in price for plantation products, which resulted in a higher budget for health care. Once that malaria had been brought under control, zones that once couldnt be farmed due to the malaria before could now be used and this provided more nutrition, thus decreasing CDR in the country. The reason why England and Wales CBR fell before Sri Lankas can once again be split up into smaller reasons, theses are: In 1842 all women and children were excluded from the mines and by 1906 no children under the age of 11 were working. This combined with the compulsory education act of 1867 meant that children were no longer seen as an economic asset. Economic changes such as more women entering work and thus not having children. The growth of ideas such as the publishing of leaflets about contraception also contributed to the decline in CBR. Also the availability of the contraception made a difference. The decline in mortality had an effect also. As more children survived, women needed to have fewer births to achieve the same family size. This is just some of the main similarities and differences between a MEDC and a LEDC, there are many more smaller ones as well as what Ive already put.

A Full-Time Income on Part-Time Hours

A Full-Time Income on Part-Time Hours A couple of years ago, after Id returned form maternity leave and decided that I quite enjoyed spending time with my son, I went part-time as a writer. Yet, despite having cut down my hours, I was able to maintain my yearly income. Wait, thats not true. I increased it. If youre a writer with a day job or a work-at-home parent in charge of noisy kids looking to make a nice income on part-time hours, you need to maximize the work you can do in those limited hours. How? Read on. 1. Take on only high-paying work. I only worked 20 hours a week during that first year as a writing parent, and so I knew that I no longer had time for $50 blog posts or articles that paid $100 for 1,000 words. Instead, I focused exclusively on $1-a-word markets and $100-per-hour projects. That meant that even if I did actual write for only 10 hours a week (the rest of the time devoted to marketing and admin), I could, in the weeks that I filled up those hours, be making $1,000 a week. Not bad! 2. Take on easier work. Before motherhood, my biggest joy was being a journalist, going out and finding untold stories from places no one had ever looked. I wrote about the environment, womens issues, politics, and business from my home in India. I won awards for my work. But this was difficult, time-consuming work, and once the ba 3. Make the most of every bit of research. I have a rule for myself: Every interview I do should lead to at least two more ideas for stories. So when I interviewed a well-known food scientist for a story about genetic modification, I ended our conversation 4. Come up with ideas in multiples of three. I rarely come up with a single idea. I come up with the idea in multiples of three. Thats because I take the initial spark of an idea and try to transform it into something that would fit into a number of different publications. So my query on how busy women can keep fit wont just be sent to a womans magazine but a magazine for working women (The Five-Minute Fitness Program for Executives), a parenting magazine (Fitness Tips for the Time-Crunched Mummy) and maybe even a general interest publication (Fitness on a Stopwatch). 5. Have a goal for every hour. Its so easy to open up your computer in the morning and waste two hours on Twitter. This happens when you dont have a plan of action. Make a to-do list for the week and then each day before bed, take the top three things you know you must do tomorrow and put them on a separate list. When you sit down to work in the morning (or during afternoon nap time), you know exactly what you need to get done. The more productive you are in the hours that youre actually working, the more youll be able to earn. Finally, remember, when people work 80 hours a week, theyre not actually working those 80 hours. Theyre working a productive 20, a not-so-productive 20, and a completely wasteful 40. So maximize your own productivity for your first 20 hours and youll be earning a full-time income in no time.